- More
- Back
If you are going to drop a clue, hide it in the next sentence.
That is the one rule of clue-planting I have ever needed, and it was given to me by my old friend and advisor (also a truly great editor) Corlies Smith — the great American editor who once edited J.D. Salinger, and who took me through several of my early books. He used to say it like that, and then he would give me an example.
You write — “and he had dark hair, dark eyes, and a broken nose.”
That is your clue. Three details. The reader has read three details about a face.
Then, on the very next line, you write — “and he fell off the stool and died.”
Now: which sentence does the reader remember?
They remember the second one. They remember the man falling off the stool. The dark hair, dark eyes, and broken nose are processed as routine descriptive scenery — the kind of detail novelists put in all the time without much consequence. The reader has filed the description and moved on. They are now thinking about the dead man on the floor.
Two hundred pages later, when the twist arrives — and the man with the broken nose turns out to be the killer’s brother, or the missing son, or the witness who lied — the reader does not feel cheated. They look back at the page and the clue is sitting there, exactly where it always was. They simply did not see it.
That is the trick. You do not say to the reader, “hello — here is a clue.” You give them something more interesting to look at on the next line.
I have used this rule for fifty years. It is the difference between a twist that makes the reader gulp and a twist that makes the reader feel they have been swindled. The fair-play twist plants its clues in plain sight. The reader is in possession of every piece of information they need to solve the puzzle. They simply do not see how the pieces fit, because the writer has been clever enough to draw their eye to something else.
A few practical applications.
In dialogue: when a character is going to lie, give them a small, ordinary tell on the line before the lie. A glance. A pause. A repeated phrase. The reader will not register it. Two hundred pages later, when the lie is exposed, the tell has been there.
In description: when a place is going to be the scene of the crime, describe it once, in passing, several chapters before. A stable. A boathouse. A drawing-room with French windows. Make the description sit at the end of a chapter that is about something else. The reader will read past it.
In action: the character who is going to matter at the end should appear, briefly and unimportantly, in chapter two. Not as a featured player. As a name dropped at a dinner table. A face seen across a room. A voice heard on a telephone. When that character returns at the end, the reader will have a flicker of recognition — and the recognition is what makes the ending feel inevitable rather than imposed.
The fair clue is the writer’s contract with the reader. Plant honestly. Hide cleverly. Reward at the right moment.
Then the reader closes the book, turns back to chapter one, and starts looking for everything they missed. That is the moment, in any thriller writer’s career, when the reader becomes a reader for life.