- More
- Back
USA
An ending that satisfies pays the promise the first page made.
That is the test, and it is harder than it sounds. The opening of a novel makes a contract with the reader: this is the kind of book you are reading, this is what is at stake, this is what you are about to feel. The last paragraph either pays that contract or breaks it. There is no middle ground. Readers can forgive almost anything in a novel — pacing problems, prose lapses, an awkward middle — but they cannot forgive an ending that breaks the contract. They close the book feeling cheated, and they do not come back to your next one.
I have a confession. There are some of our greatest, award-winning authors — there is one in particular who shall be nameless — who is the best starter of a novel I have ever known. There is another, also distinguished, who is brilliant on the middle. The two I am thinking of, both of them highly distinguished, can’t end a book for love nor money. The award-winning openers run out of road. The award-winning middles flag in the final third. They are, in many ways, better writers than I am. But on the ending, they have learned what I have learned: the ending is not where the writer’s work gets easier. The ending is where it gets hardest.
The test of a good ending is, for me, simple — and it is the test I apply to my own books before I send them off. The reader has to read the last line and feel they cannot quite breathe. If the book has a twist, the twist has to make them gulp — and they will not gulp if they have seen it coming, so you have to tease them, perhaps with a minor clue, and then deliver. If the book does not have a twist, the ending has to land like a finished chord. The book has to feel, in its final paragraph, complete — as if the story has resolved into the only shape it could ever have had.
The greatest closing paragraph in English fiction, for me, is the last fourteen words of A Tale of Two Cities. Sydney Carton at the guillotine. I shall not quote the line — go and read it, and read it aloud — but Dickens spends three hundred pages building toward those fourteen words, and when they arrive, they pay every promise the book has made. That is what an ending is supposed to do.
The other ending I think about is The Tempest. Prospero, the old magician, has every reason to take revenge on the men who exiled him. He has them in his power. He has the means. The whole play has been moving toward the moment of vengeance — and at the last possible moment Shakespeare turns the play around. Prospero says: the rarer action is in virtue than in vengeance. He forgives them. He breaks his staff. He goes home. I have seen the play perhaps fifteen times since my twenties, and every time the forgiveness scene undoes me. It is what every storyteller hopes to achieve, and almost none of us do: a work that feels, at the end, like a kindness.
What an ending is not is a summary. The writer who tries to tie up every thread, explain every choice, give every character a clean fate — that writer has misunderstood what the reader needs. The reader needs the feeling of completeness, not the documentation of it. Trust the reader to fill in the silences.
Write the book. Write the last line. Then check: does the line make the reader gulp, or land like a finished chord? If neither, you have not yet written the ending. You have written somewhere within the third act. Keep going.
The same principle applies at the end as at the beginning. Spend ten times longer on your last chapter than on any chapter in the middle. Spend ten times longer on your last line than on any line that came before. The first chapter is what makes a reader buy your book. The last chapter is what makes them buy your next one.
The gulp test. If your book has a twist, the last line should make the reader feel they cannot quite breathe. If it doesn’t, you haven’t yet written the ending.
